feat(ai): AI 教练 —— 晨间简报、运动处方、趋势归因与 Copilot
数值全部在服务端算好再交给模型,模型只做解读。让模型从 CSV 里自己推 z 分数,它算错的次数足以让简报引用图表反驳它的数字。 - services/insights.py:z 分数(28 天个人基线,且**排除当天**——用一个 值参与算出来的均值去衡量它自己,会把真实离群点摊平)、13 个月趋势斜率 (按序数日期最小二乘,手表放充电器上一周不会压缩 x 轴)、近 7 天活动量 对比。 - services/coach.py:三套提示词 + 回复解析,每套都配一个规则引擎版本。 网关一次生成要几分钟,上游被限流时给一个朴素的答案,好过给一张空卡片。 - services/ai.py:多轮 chat()、SSE stream()、complete()/stream_chat(), 以及 extract_json()——上游是推理模型,可见输出以思维链开头,所以从末尾 倒着找最后一个配平的 JSON(字符串感知,扛得住引号里的 } 和转义引号)。 - 接口 briefing / trend-insight / copilot(SSE),缓存表 ai_insights。 - 前端:今日页晨报卡(后台生成 + 轮询升级)、全局 Copilot 浮窗、指标详情 页归因面板。features.ai 打开。 实测(对着自建 ai-gateway):晨报一次 273 秒,缓存命中 18 毫秒——所以简报 绝不能同步阻塞首屏。网关的流式通道比阻塞通道更不可靠:同一条提示词流式 139 秒后返回「所有模型均不可用」,阻塞则成功,因此 stream_chat() 在流式零 输出时对同一模型退回非流式重试。Copilot 实测 TTFB 9ms、全程 40 秒。 顺带修两处:refresh 原来只跳过缓存读、不删行,导致「重新生成」后的轮询读 到旧行、看到 cached 就停了,用户一直盯着他刚要求替换掉的那段字;基线零方差 时原来返回 z=0.0,把「和每一条观测都不同」标成「完全正常」,改为 z=null。 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -53,7 +53,9 @@ CORS_ORIGIN=http://localhost:3000,http://localhost:5173
|
||||
# absorbs single-vendor quota limits. Reached directly, bypassing any local
|
||||
# HTTP proxy. NOTE: its NVIDIA upstream is a large reasoning model — replies
|
||||
# can take 2-3 minutes, so set AI_TIMEOUT_SECONDS accordingly.
|
||||
AI_GATEWAY_BASE_URL=http://129.146.26.249:5100/v1
|
||||
# HTTPS (Caddy, strips the /ai prefix) rather than http://…:5100 — the token
|
||||
# rides in an Authorization header and should not cross the internet in clear.
|
||||
AI_GATEWAY_BASE_URL=https://oracle.zichuan.xyz/ai/v1
|
||||
AI_GATEWAY_TOKEN=
|
||||
AI_GATEWAY_MODEL=ai-gateway-auto
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -73,7 +75,17 @@ AI_MODEL_CHAIN=gateway,gemini-flash,llama-70b
|
||||
# payload always fits that model's own context window.
|
||||
AI_DAY_BUDGET=365
|
||||
|
||||
AI_TIMEOUT_SECONDS=180
|
||||
# Measured against the gateway, not guessed: a trivial prompt took 138s end to
|
||||
# end, because its primary upstream emits a full chain of thought before the
|
||||
# answer. Nothing user-facing blocks on this (the briefing generates in a
|
||||
# background thread), but the timeout still has to clear the real latency.
|
||||
AI_TIMEOUT_SECONDS=300
|
||||
# Output cap. Reasoning models spend part of it thinking before they answer;
|
||||
# entries that need more declare their own budget in services/ai.py.
|
||||
AI_MAX_TOKENS=1024
|
||||
|
||||
# Output cap for the AI coach (晨报 / 趋势归因 / Copilot). Larger than
|
||||
# AI_MAX_TOKENS above: the same reasoning trace is spent from this budget
|
||||
# before the answer starts, and at 1024 the reply was all thinking with the
|
||||
# JSON truncated away.
|
||||
AI_COACH_MAX_TOKENS=4000
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user